From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,79b248c1cf206957
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-06 07:26:45 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why is memory footprint smaller when compiled static?
Date: 6 Jun 2002 07:26:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <17cd177c.0206060626.197bfd2e@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.1023321903.7863.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.40.39.20
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1023373605 12566 127.0.0.1 (6 Jun 2002 14:26:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Jun 2002 14:26:45 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25404
Date: 2002-06-06T14:26:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Steven Deller:

# Normally linkers can't do "dead code elimination", though some are
# getting almost smart enough to do that.

May I correct ? I'd write:

  Normally linkers can do "dead code elimination", though some are
  not yet smart enough to do that.

:-)

________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm

NB: For a direct answer, address on the Web site!