From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84be9c5a380874d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-30 12:31:59 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: gprof with gnat
Date: 30 Apr 2002 12:31:59 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <17cd177c.0204301131.63213cc2@posting.google.com>
References: <3CCD2328.C5722FC3@epfl.ch> <3CCE6DF1.46B5450E@epfl.ch>
 <4519e058.0204300558.49ff7b08@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.162.107.126
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1020195119 15250 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2002 19:31:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Apr 2002 19:31:59 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23293
Date: 2002-04-30T19:31:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Charles Fr. Rey:

> > Is Ada so performant that it doesn't need to be profiled ? ;-)

T.E.D.:
 
> Not really.
> 
> I attempted to use it on Windows about a year ago, with rather rotten
> luck. Most of the problems stem from the fact that Gnat doesn't use
> the latest gcc, and thus you can't use the latest gprof. Hopefully
> this problem will go away with gcc 3.1.

What are the problems ?
At least my small experiments with gprof (provided with GNAT 3.13p for
Windows) do run well...
E.g. by profiling the Unzip-Ada tool (trying to analyse the slow
I/Os).
___________________________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/unzipada.htm

NB: For a direct answer, address on the Web site!