From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c397a9e135b263db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-06 07:05:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What happens to DEC Ada? Date: 6 Aug 2001 07:05:23 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <17cd177c.0108060605.3dead633@posting.google.com> References: <9ff447f2.0107310659.36d01e9@posting.google.com> <%jra7.3545$257.153834@ozemail.com.au> <3b6def8c.4410400@news.tc.umn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.40.39.50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 997106723 25573 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2001 14:05:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Aug 2001 14:05:23 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11352 Date: 2001-08-06T14:05:23+00:00 List-Id: Nicolas: > A very simple and normal use of cvs without any "dick around" shows the > problem. > Just try ... About your problem: shouldn't you also have different directories for .ali and .o files corresponding to the different compilations with these source files having same name and same timestamp ? I think you should. So, you would have a clean recompilation for each version without the least doubt of an undesired mixture... I find it a project management bug to count on smart recompilation for differenciating source versions. Already mixing compilations with different options can be a problem. And instead of playing with ADA_INCLUDE_PATH, it would be safer to select source directories with the -I option; same for objects and ADA_OBJECTS_PATH. G.