From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: operation can be dispatching in only one type Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:14:26 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <17c8a7kqoxvff.aa1raqev6xlu$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <04eb6626-644b-4b16-a329-c35659a9fbe2@googlegroups.com> <1ephv5ugr5mib$.9ehadf3dddct$.dlg@40tude.net> <1nf8wc05tjtvf$.1ctjb9hsr0qsp.dlg@40tude.net> <8132c558-aec2-41f4-8024-4a75a2d497ae@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: p9a8jKAGz0rpkSSbWxF1gQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28547 Date: 2015-11-26T14:14:26+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:30:09 -0800 (PST), Serge Robyns wrote: > On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 18:38:53 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> The object is a proxy to a persistent object. It is OK to update the proxy >> without committing changes to the persistent counterpart. But note that you >> still want to extend compiler-generated setters. E.g. for marking the proxy >> object out-of-sync. Thus when a transaction is getting committed the >> connection handler would store all updated objects. > > Can you please elaborate what you mean by a "compiler-generated" setter? > Because from what I do understand from your explanation about marking the > proxy is something I'm looking for and maybe to far while it's right under > my nose. type T is record X : Integer; end record; The compiler generated setter is something like inventing Ada-like notation: procedure ".X" (Left : in out T; Right : Integer); Called as follows: Y : T; begin Y.X := 10; If Ada were a better language you could override getters/setters and provide your own implementation: type T is private record -- This is not Ada! X : Integer; end record; private type T is new DB.Handle with null record; -- No Integer members! procedure ".X" (Left : in out T; Right : Integer); function ".X" (Left : T) return Integer); P.S. Surely, at some point there would a kludge invented with aspects as it was done for array indexing... -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de