From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b59b337045eece60 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Structure of the multitasking server Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <17a9dc9a-9a68-47a4-8415-fd51a299959a@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> References: <8b4d1170-22e6-40d3-8ed1-096dc0163491@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.3.87.130 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222017805 31931 127.0.0.1 (21 Sep 2008 17:23:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.3.87.130; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070206 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2054 Date: 2008-09-21T10:23:24-07:00 List-Id: On 19 Wrz, 15:34, Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > Why not simply use a rendezvous? This is something that I deliberately wanted to avoid. I don't like the idea of tasks interacting with each other directly and I prefer to have the communication part extracted away (Ravenscar got that right for a reason, I think?). In theory, I could also change the queuing strategy without modifying the worker task. -- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com Database Access Library for Ada: www.inspirel.com/soci-ada