From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2843c5eea3415584
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: APQ
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:23:37 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1783qdmyn694w.1mvizvesh5ohr$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <sa4brcv2l5m.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <Onewd.204$Wt5.95202@read2.cgocable.net>
 <ydCdnUENQ8wivV_cRVn-sQ@megapath.net> <sa4d5x9si42.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <GTswd.248$Wt5.145533@read2.cgocable.net>
 <sa41xdpsfnt.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <cpu73t$9nr$1@kda-news.kongsberg.com>
 <sa4pt19qhg1.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <sa4acscr0vv.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <qmYwd.366$jT5.52@read1.cgocable.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net yAmzwh2a0rfvJBU9mGIHLA6ec2nbvYEpw+K67pz57nu5MOBrM=
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.12.1
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7052
Date: 2004-12-18T19:23:37+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:52:52 -0500, Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote:

> Brian May wrote:

>> Also, I noticed that the pointers are "access all". I couldn't see any
>> requirement for "all", and my code still compiles, so I changed them
>> to "access". This eliminates a potential source of errors.
> 
> I can't imagine it making a practical difference here, but
> perhaps I lack imagination on this point.

Potentially plain access pointers could be more efficient.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de