From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,MSGID_SHORT
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 13 Oct 92 20:34:03 GMT
From: gvls1!aviary!dmarshal@louie.udel.edu  (Dave Marshall)
Subject: SPC's Ada Quality & Style (followup)
Message-ID: <1766@aviary.Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Not too long ago, I posted a request for information on how well
individual instantiations of the Software Productivy Consortium's
Ada Quality & Style: Guidelines for Professional Programmers were
working out.

I got a number of responses, most with interesting comments.  Thanks
to those who wrote back.  There was no grand consensus on how best
to use these guidelines, so I am hesitant to issue a summary of the
responses.

I received one comment to which I must respond.  Someone advised me that
the version we are using, 02.00.02 is not the latest revision.  Not true.

I spoke to someone at SPC today who told me that it was the latest
revision.  Also, they will be issuing a new revision near the end of the
year.

-- 
                                           Dave Marshall
                                           dmarshal@stars.reston.unisys.com