From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3c2ec05bff4ab48
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a32g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada: Inheritance of generics
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <1755c5d8-8c27-4219-8670-80086f098ba5@a32g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <g20t5p$ptn$1@aioe.org>
 <1d2swajw7rsue$.ftt2098a7wvt$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<g20vec$1k1$1@aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212419589 16241 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2008 15:13:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a32g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
	posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.12)
	Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:524
Date: 2008-06-02T08:13:09-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jun 2, 7:17 am, Dennis Hoppe <dennis.ho...@hoppinet.de> wrote:
> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:39:05 +0200, Dennis Hoppe wrote:
>
> >> -- child unit
> >> generic
> >>    -- omitted
> >> package Generic_Child is
> >>    type Object is new Generic_Parent.Object with private;
>
> > This is illegal. Generic_Parent is a generic unit, you cannot refer to
> > anything within it without either instantiation of, or else from a generic
> > child unit of. Generic_Child is not a child package of Generic_Parent.
>
> Hmm...this line is really a left over from simple inheritance without
> generic unit, but the Ada compiler does not complain about it.
>
> > P.S. Except for trivial cases, it is always better to post complete code
> > samples.
>
> I thought, this example was exhaustive: parent, child, instantiation.

"Complete code sample" means something that you can compile.  In this
case, it's hard to tell what you're trying to do.  If your units are
all top-level library units, there's a lot of WITH's missing; plus
2**16 is not a type, so you can't instantiate Generic_Package with it,
and there's no completion for the private type extension Object,
you've tried to instantiate a type instead of a generic package.
Sometimes it's good enough to leave stuff out, but in this case I
can't tell what you're trying to do, and I suspect I'm not alone.

There's so many things wrong with this code that I'm just going to
take a guess at what you're trying to do and hope it's close to what
you're looking for.  If not, you'll need to explain more about what
you're trying to accomplish.  The following Ada source does compile.

generic
   type Modular_Type is mod <>;
package Generic_Parent is
   type Object is abstract tagged limited null record;

   function Example return Integer;
end Generic_Parent;

-- child unit
generic
   -- omitted
package Generic_Parent.Generic_Child is
   type Object is new Generic_Parent.Object with private;

   function Example return Integer;
private
   type Object is new Generic_Parent.Object with null record;
       -- or whatever you want in the type extension
end Generic_Parent.Generic_Child;

package Mod_Package is
   type Unsigned_16 is mod 2**16;
end Mod_Package;

with Generic_Parent;
with Mod_Package;
package Parent is new Generic_Parent (Mod_Package.Unsigned_16);

with Parent;
with Generic_Parent.Generic_Child;
package Child is new Parent.Generic_Child;

with Child;
package Pak1 is
   A : Integer := Child.Example;
end Pak1;

                          -- HTH, Adam