From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a3b1c6915ea1273
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.196.130 with SMTP id im2mr1668375pbc.3.1326480751272;
        Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni178342pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How many Ada compiler bugs are here?
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:52:22 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <174t2s4utb9f7$.ee17v54xprdm$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <wccboq7d4md.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <11extopcf5hsy.qk7psu30kjrp.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1261983835348169208.338335rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: PPt+vSuBRqtkVsMLa1J3Dg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-01-13T19:52:22+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13 Jan 2012 17:42:57 GMT, georg bauhaus wrote:

> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:06:02 -0500, Robert A Duff wrote:
>> 
>>> Here's a workaround:
>>> 
>>>    function Foo return T is
>>>    begin
>>>       raise Constraint_Error;
>>>       return Foo; -- kludgy recursive call; can't get here!
>>>    end Foo;
>> 
>> Cool! I never thought about that. Thanks!
> 
> Have you used gnatstub before?

Never. I always add a specification and the body together, i.e.

   spec A
   body A
   spec B
   body B
   ...

rather than

   spec A
   spec B
   ...
   body A
   body B
   ...

Otherwise I would certainly forget to implement something, because I do not
do coverage testing.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de