From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.52.36.197 with SMTP id s5mr739463vdj.5.1410446949589;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.117.7 with SMTP id ka7mr35083igb.2.1410446949449; Thu, 11
 Sep 2014 07:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!s7no62027qap.1!news-out.google.com!ef6ni2722igb.0!nntp.google.com!r10no170297igi.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0b68f842-b99d-40ce-bada-a66e6dbc4e79@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=KSa2aQoAAACOxnC0usBJYX8NE3x3a1Xq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
References: <0868c42e-ed44-4b36-a929-2bffb338ee34@googlegroups.com>
 <0b68f842-b99d-40ce-bada-a66e6dbc4e79@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <170fc6ce-26bf-4376-b70e-789dabf4f3a0@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Assuming optimization? What is best of these code alternatives?
From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:49:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:188968
Date: 2014-09-11T07:49:08-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:20:00 AM UTC-7, gautier...@hotmail.com wrote:

> In any case the value i1 + i2 is the initial value for the loop, so even a totally non-optimizing compiler will compute the initial loop value once.

You also missed the outer loop.  Please see my other response.

                                 -- Adam