From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!unido!gmdka!systeam
From: systeam@gmdka.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: A Problem With Access Types - (nf)
Message-ID: <1700002@gmdka.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 22-Apr-87 06:04:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: gmdka.1700002
Posted: Wed Apr 22 06:04:00 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Apr-87 23:46:42 EDT
References: <114147060@skl-crc.UUCP>
Nf-ID: #R:skl-crc:114147060:gmdka:1700002:000:432
Nf-From: gmdka!systeam    Apr 22 12:04:00 1987
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Could it be that you only want the effect of passing your record
by reference to the procedure UPDATE so that no big chuncks of memory get 
copied around? If so, please note that any good Ada compiler (e.g. ours) uses
the call by reference mechanism for in out parameters of your type.

My Address:
Dr. Peter Dencker
SYSTEAM KG Dr. Winterstein
Am Rueppurer Schloss 7
D 7500 Karlsruhe 51
West Germany

UUCP-mail:  systeam@gmdka.uucp