From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.86.200 with SMTP id t8mr62250732qal.0.1373879777589; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 02:16:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.17.42 with SMTP id l10mr1643169qed.10.1373879777569; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 02:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!t19no1561922qam.0!news-out.google.com!f7ni2680qai.0!nntp.google.com!t19no1661797qam.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 02:16:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <747d50ba-8076-4fc2-9e91-ce3923caa1f0@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=41.160.242.244; posting-account=p-xPhAkAAADjHQWEO7sFME2XBdF1P_2H NNTP-Posting-Host: 41.160.242.244 References: <20130712075752.46e2cf01@atmarama.noip.me> <7619c730-b138-4bd9-a0e7-9c80d26f7f00@googlegroups.com> <81e2d51a-90a5-4c82-b275-80b345b894f6@googlegroups.com> <747d50ba-8076-4fc2-9e91-ce3923caa1f0@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <169334c5-f79f-499a-b682-bdae0c05cb24@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada-Python demo From: Peter Brooks Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:16:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Bytes: 2273 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182521 Date: 2013-07-15T02:16:17-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, 15 July 2013 10:10:27 UTC+2, Maciej Sobczak wrote: >=20 > Interestingly, as far as I know, *nobody* does it. In other words, nobody= chooses to benefit from the freedom to use anything they like. Which kind = of suggests that having a data model that works out of the box is perhaps a= better idea than not having it and pretending that communication and data = model are independent. Technically they are, but from the usability point o= f view they are closely related. >=20 A lot of people design ontologies, they're very important, so far mainly in= static but large repositories. I'm keen on one for a much less static situation. A also agree that XML is not a good basis, so I'd prefer work with dot and = JSON.