From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,db5fb6cdf7727573,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kari@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU ("Kari A. Nies")
Subject: thread-safe malloc for GNAT
Date: 1996/06/10
Message-ID: <16781.834437608@liege.ics.uci.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159488451
organization: University of California, Irvine
reply-to: kari@ics.uci.edu
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



Hi Everyone,

I've been working with GNAT 3.03 on a sun/sparc sunos
platform.  I'm working on an applicatino written in both
Ada95 and C++.  The Ada code is task intensive.  My C++ code
is dying in a legit memory allocation.  The problem seems
to be because my system malloc is not thread-safe.

Has anyone else had this problem while working with GNAT?
Does anyone know of a thread-safe malloc that is compatible
with the GNAT run-time system?

Please cc any responses directly to me.
Thanks for any help in this matter,

Kari A. Nies    (kari@ics.uci.edu)
--              * Arcadia Project
--              * Department of Information and Computer Science
--              * University of California  Irvine, CA 92717-3425
--              * phone: (714) 824-8756     fax: (714) 824-4056