From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.software-eng:3059 comp.lang.ada:3385 comp.lang.c:26569
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!spdcc!ima!haddock!karl
From: karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Productivity and error rates for Ada projects
Message-ID: <16086@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Date: 5 Mar 90 03:10:31 GMT
References: <8221@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1990Mar3.235039.13870@athena.mit.edu>
Reply-To: karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer)
Organization: Interactive Systems, Cambridge, MA 02138-5302
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1990Mar3.235039.13870@athena.mit.edu> tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael J Zehr) writes:
>On a related issue, i noticed a much greater correlation between the
>errors and the original coder than i did between errors and the language
>being used.

I think you've just provided the key observation.

Karl W. Z. Heuer (karl@ima.ima.isc.com or harvard!ima!karl), The Walking Lint