From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5468df70e82939f4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.77.39 with SMTP id p7mr213290paw.0.1344557222135; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Path: c10ni98112pbw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Patrick Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Free learning resources for Ada (are they good enough?) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <15ace9b4-a964-4052-9fc5-94330b159f55@googlegroups.com> References: <6d05c25a-7273-47ad-b4b0-8011366c2a62@googlegroups.com> <5023bc51$0$9522$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <1a4752e6-1474-4163-9863-817b00aba559@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.53.16.194 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344557222 2825 127.0.0.1 (10 Aug 2012 00:07:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:07:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1a4752e6-1474-4163-9863-817b00aba559@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.53.16.194; posting-account=cUi90woAAADTaOISowbbHM8GUD0-opJO User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-08-09T17:07:01-07:00 List-Id: Hi Dufr I asked this same question on IRC 6 months ago. No, Ada 95 is a good place = to start and even Ada 83 is okay. The revisions are 99% additive. Ada 2005 = might just have confusing stuff you don't need right now and i don't think = there is a full Ada 2012 compiler yet so i really would not worry about it= . Yep, I meant John Englishes book.