From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!pacbell!ames!ncar!ico!vail!rcd
From: rcd@ico.ISC.COM (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Objectification
Summary: OK, but get a real word!
Message-ID: <15991@vail.ICO.ISC.COM>
Date: 7 Aug 89 23:00:03 GMT
References: <534@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp, Boulder, CO
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

eberard@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Edward Berard) writes about many matters and
meta-matters roughly related to OOP and moving toward it.  All well, but
couldn't someone come up with a better word (or perhaps I should just say
"a word") for the concept?  "Objectification" is sufficiently ugly and
silly-sounding (sounds like it came out of a congressional committee) to be
an impediment to the goals.
-- 
Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com    uucp: {ncar,nbires}!ico!rcd     (303)449-2870
   ...Simpler is better.