From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9544fb5ce0a6df8b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.15.41 with SMTP id u9mr32238703pbc.3.1322583458387;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni38214pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Overloading attributes
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <157dd2e2-e3a5-45f5-92bf-9b6311e8f5e8@p16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
References: <8ed87fee-166a-4be9-ae6c-4d0fbeb4788c@s6g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jasb8q$sgv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jasnea$ac1$1@dont-email.me>
 <jau4t6$7ms$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jaug0j$ph5$1@dont-email.me>
 <javj7h$ftm$1@speranza.aioe.org> <rNudnaTdZOKn9U7T4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
 <jb2hdo$3fg$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.7.100.80
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1322583394 22745 127.0.0.1 (29 Nov 2011 16:16:34
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:16:34 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: p16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.7.100.80;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0;
 rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19240
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2011-11-29T08:16:33-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 29 Nov., 12:58, a...@att.net wrote:
> Where in the RM does it say that the compiler and RTL is the implementation?
> As everyone says the Ada RM is the final word! And if it is not defined in
> the RM then the compiler and RTL are not the implementation, but are the
> tools for the implementation.
... Rest of all this nonsense skipped.

Do we really need to further reply to all this incredible junk?