From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!umigw!umbio!ibiza!aem
From: aem@ibiza.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Subliminal
Keywords: RFC 1097
Message-ID: <1571@umbio.MIAMI.EDU>
Date: 15 Apr 89 01:53:02 GMT
References: <6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Sender: netnews@umbio.MIAMI.EDU
Reply-To: aem@Mthvax.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg)
Organization: University of Miami Hertz Lab, Coral Gables, FL
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, <rjh@cs.purdue.EDU> wrote:
>I sincerely hope RFC 1097 is a joke, subliminal suggestion is a devious and
>underhanded way to influence people into taking actions or adopt ideas
>without their consent.  People should be afraid to look at terminals if
>there is a possibility subliminal messages are being sent.  Why isn't this
>practice illegal?  I vote for a complete banning of subliminal messages from
>any electronic medium and propose for now a banning of subliminal messages
>across the Internet.  Subliminal messages are a dangerous threat to our
>security and the integrity of the Internet.



Not to mention a threat to our precious bodily
fluids.... :-) :-)



aem




a.e.mossberg - aem@mthvax.miami.edu - aem@miavax.SPAN - aem@umiami.BITNET 
As for critisism, do it in good time; don't get into the habit of criticizing
only after the event.					- Chairman Mao