From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,19140af19dfa6e01 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-12 09:13:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 0Y plans for garbage collection? Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:49:12 +0200 Organization: AdaCL Message-ID: <1557617.vUiuI5kIPQ@linux1.krischik.com> References: <1127954.kcBZz6amlf@linux1.krischik.com> <3F60E747.40805@attbi.com> Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1063383052 04 28613 WCvmVVWGSlAOWs 030912 16:10:52 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: booZbGZHZeg9pRj5LdZcRTFGYxHQS5oQV2wehi2EOn9P5G0VLR6+kp User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42416 Date: 2003-09-12T17:49:12+02:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > But reference counting could be made much more easy and attractive if > smart pointers have more light-weighted implementation than controlled > types in generic packages. There are too many problems with that: I agree with you on that one. A reference counting access type would be as good a real garbage collector. With Regards -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com