From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3869f0598191b11d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Porting ADA source Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:13:17 +0200 Organization: AdaCL Message-ID: <1557095.IqZkPHBk70@linux1.krischik.com> References: Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1090340950 02 6320 V0W6XMflWN4l1Aj 040720 16:29:10 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: GnfD6cZXgeFqMaGDrebl85VZ3EkAixoJ9No7pue-nRGi2oI3KANKYf User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2280 Date: 2004-07-20T18:13:17+02:00 List-Id: Wes Groleau wrote: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> What is the advantage of forbidding "string" ? > > to support these types. Character was the only predefined > type exempt (why was that different?), so arrays of Character > with "portable" index types were used instead of String. Because Character and Wide_Character are the only types which can't be expressed in Ada itself. There are some form of enumeration but not all values are legal Ada. But you knew that, didn't you? With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com