From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,56131a5c3acc678e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-03 11:22:13 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.arcor-online.net!news.belwue.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question about OO programming in Ada
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:35:09 +0100
Organization: AdaCL
Message-ID: <1522082.HppT5vqRXm@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <bq092s$9ph$1@online.de> <uhe0sqfud.fsf@nasa.gov>
 <bq0qfs$3ja$1@online.de> <GpednY19wYJAdFmiRVn-gg@comcast.com>
 <bq3mef$49e$1@online.de>
 <8urxb.19482$sb4.18182@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <ygAxb.8265$lF6.7551@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <1792884.HtYz4Yv8lY@linux1.krischik.com>
 <1070297262.361122@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1070479242 02 2555 5wOSGxDOv0yDRUm 031203 19:20:42
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: ZZXogEZFoe5vCnfi3BAHamKj5DgH2rfFdFEBnQZIliS9Iw8kfvGFYP
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3109
Date: 2003-12-03T19:35:09+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen wrote:

> Martin Krischik wrote:
>> How will you do this without using some form of "Unchecked_"?
> 
> Why am I limited to not using Unchecked_Deallocation?
> This is merely the operation known to C programmers as "free"
> and to C++ programmers as "delete". It's used for dealing with
> dynamic memory structures, with parts whose lifetime is controlled
> explicitly by the program. That's hardly a novel or infrequently
> used feature of the language.
> 
> I expect that C and C++ programs that don't use free and delete
> don't have many dangling references either (although they can
> screw up in more ways than Ada can).

The OP spoke about that all unsafe operation are marked Unchecked_ and this
is what i was refairing to.

With Regards

Martin

-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://adacl.sourceforge.net