From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "functional" programming in Ada
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:11:14 +0100
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
Message-ID: <1520428274.2488.155.camel@obry.net>
References: <p7luc6$fu7$1@dont-email.me>
	 <896b83c6-83d4-4ffc-8c56-1481802ea8fd@googlegroups.com>
	 <961c82e0-7d7e-48af-8751-916a3332ccc5@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: pascal@obry.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: q+TpqISbeKpqrrPnG6cVng.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.5-1 
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50875
Date: 2018-03-07T14:11:14+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 =C3=A0 02:52 -0800, Mehdi Saada a =C3=A9crit :
> Why not writing everything in the specs then ? Maybe the original
> separation of specs and bodies is a mistake, in the light of recent
> tools requirements.

The spec is what is exposed to other units.

The body is implementation details.

The separation is to me one of the most important point in Ada. I think
that all languages should have done that. It is an welcomed separation
for software engineer.

My 2 cents,

--=20
  Pascal Obry /  Magny Les Hameaux (78)

  The best way to travel is by means of imagination

  http://www.obry.net

  gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B