From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: why is ada better than forth haskell lisp swi prolog and pharo?
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 17:03:07 +0100
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
Message-ID: <1510416187.30535.107.camel@obry.net>
References: <7b34a80f-00cf-406e-b99e-a8c8b8f4ad1f@googlegroups.com>
	 <c57f991d-558d-4f1c-86f3-9146660f1c10@googlegroups.com>
	 <8cca1136-b15a-4528-82c5-3505e2416915@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: pascal@obry.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: nC3hqUysINTJvGXf7G85zQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.2-1 
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48822
Date: 2017-11-11T17:03:07+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le samedi 11 novembre 2017 =C3=A0 02:30 -0800, Ingo M. a =C3=A9crit :
> > it is better than any random list of other ones ;-)
>=20
> Ah, that explains why SPARK 2014 (which is better than Ada) is not
> built with Ada but OCaml :-)

I understand the ":)" but yet this is far from true. SPARK is built in
Ada, only a prover is in OCaml. I'm not sure all of them are.

The SPARK compiler and checker is in Ada.

--=20
  Pascal Obry /  Magny Les Hameaux (78)

  The best way to travel is by means of imagination

  http://www.obry.net

  gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B