From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eeb3ea7993143012
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr8129388pbc.2.1337220506375;
        Wed, 16 May 2012 19:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni7378pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Declaring private packages to instantiate generics?
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <15088039.2720.1337217898163.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynln6>
References: <jp0d51$q7e$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <25586653.906.1337178987063.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcvy1>
 <jp0eht$tt5$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.2.54.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337220506 14705 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2012 02:08:26
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 02:08:26 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <jp0eht$tt5$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.2.54.122;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-05-16T18:24:58-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:45:20 AM UTC-5, Markus Sch=F6pflin wrote:
> Am 16.05.2012 16:36, schrieb Adam Beneschan:
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> >> ---%<---
> >> package body FOO is
> >>     package BAR is new SOME_GENERIC_PACKAGE;
> >>     procedure BAR_P is new BAR.P;
> >>     procedure P is begin BAR_P; end;
> >> end FOO;
> >> --->%---
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Markus
> >
> > You can change the last to
> >
> >     procedure P renames BAR_P;
>=20
> Thanks for your answer. Not as nice as I had hoped, but basically what I =
was=20
> looking for.
>=20
> Markus

Why is using RENAMES not nice?
It seems that the only difference between using RENAMES and what you showed=
 (procedure P is new BAR.P;) is the syntax.