From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,20dd8ed49a092517 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.180.105.38 with SMTP id gj6mr99196wib.0.1348190011652; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: ed8ni3498083wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:58:49 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <14ja6r525roa0.77ouqrv4hvod$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <99575344-c301-4af2-9155-b6577bfb1ca6@googlegroups.com> <106b2629-3428-4290-8c73-8f6b91b123a1@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-09-17T17:58:49+02:00 List-Id: On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:41:18 -0700 (PDT), alb348@gmail.com wrote: > That why I was asking which one is easier to use. To get an answer you would need somebody who extensively used both. I did only GTK. GTK is not simple by any measure, though I doubt that Qt could be much better/worse. But that is only a guess. As for me, I took GTK merely because AdaCore did. P.S. There are at least two Ada Qt bindings, AFAIK. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de