From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Annoyances Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:29:11 +0200 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <1498048151.20885.28.camel@obry.net> References: <1ac5a44b-4423-443a-a7bb-2864d9abe78f@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: pascal@obry.net NNTP-Posting-Host: NfdC6XRTmGD1ceKRWmGzhg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47039 Date: 2017-06-21T14:29:11+02:00 List-Id: Le mercredi 21 juin 2017 =C3=A0 04:58 -0700, joakimds@kth.se a =C3=A9crit= =C2=A0: > Hi! I am also concerned about performance. I'm always like most of programmers. But that's why I do not try to optimize anything early. A good design, architecture will always propose a fast application. And it is a waste of programmer time to optimize a routine that count for 0.1% of the total time in the final application. So do check for performance when the application actually run. I've come across contrived code just for the sake of trying to gain some CPU cycle. There was nothing gained and for sure it costs lot of review time and recoding. My 2 cents, --=20 =C2=A0 Pascal Obry /=C2=A0=C2=A0Magny Les Hameaux (78) =C2=A0 The best way to travel is by means of imagination =C2=A0=C2=A0http://www.obry.net =C2=A0 gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B