From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a32653cf595422e6
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr13199345pbb.2.1335170598829;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni88606pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and register allocation
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <14809265.1982.1335170598477.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuo17>
References: <4f9138c2$0$6628$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4f9145b5$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <jmrpej$cao$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4f918218$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <87ipgtgkho.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <4f94379b$0$6639$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <25429130.1239.1335127991071.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlp2>
 <4f94770e$0$7615$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.122.158.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335170598 19825 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2012 08:43:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:43:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <4f94770e$0$7615$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=206.122.158.4;
 posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-04-23T01:43:18-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> The goal is to find ways to control the compilers
> so that they produce predictably good result at least when the programs
> are run on a subset of CPUs known in advance.

Any chance to use a combination of Ada-to-C precompiler + Intel C compiler ?
My impression is that the Intel compilers are more successful in finding the right blend of options itself, and with less effort for the programmer...

Cheers

G.