From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f27bbe0678fdfc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett)
Subject: Re: huge executable??
Date: 2000/05/15
Message-ID: <147034997wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 623849381
X-Mail2News-Path: 
 news.demon.net!finch-post-10.mail.demon.net!natron.demon.co.uk
References: <391E09C3.FA04871E@mailandnews.com>
 <9EET4.760$pN4.423580@news.pacbell.net>
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 958436979 mail2news:21403 mail2news
 mail2news.demon.co.uk
Organization: Real Objects Ltd
Reply-To: Roger@natron.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 2000-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article: <9EET4.760$pN4.423580@news.pacbell.net>  tmoran@bix.com writes:
> 
>[snip]
>   The more important question is, is size a problem with real
> programs that do something substantial.


I've just loaded down one of the "new generation" Java IDE tools
(anyone else notice that the generations are getting shorter, or is
it just me getting older ?) for Win32. The installation notes state
that the minimum memory requirement to run the thing is 128Mb, 
with 256Mb recommended.


Hmm.


-- 
Roger Barnett