From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fce663eaf40b52f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: with use - again [Was: Manifesto against Vector]
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 15:06:48 +0200
Organization: AdaCL
Message-ID: <1462311.VSzvND73DJ@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <mailman.63.1083641204.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <feQlc.6993$V97.2116@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <mailman.68.1083695056.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <bebbba07.0405042128.1a322885@posting.google.com>
 <c7b8oa$o6v$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <bebbba07.0405051942.59af7456@posting.google.com>
 <13387035.PloetEPshz@linux1.krischik.com> <m3zn8knyli.fsf@niflheim.malonet>
Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1083941375 05 24345 uDP0GCSLENFnHOz 040507 14:49:35
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: bou3mTZcreeAHagYN-XvZPiDYT6HF4+OaXP3DKfwYgbaW8N7CfKeZZ
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7
Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:369
Date: 2004-05-07T15:06:48+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mark wrote:

> Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

>> The use of "use" should be forbidden in tutorials.
 
> The use of "use" should just be forbidden. This would save us the
> endless discussions of why "use" can't implicitly "with" a package.

I would not go that far. I am with some of the other poster: keep use close
to where it is needed. 

But perhaps use should not have been allowed on declarative level. Or is
there really a difference between:

with A;
package B
use A
end B;

and

with A; use A;
package B
end B;

With Regards

Martin

-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com