From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Addressing in Object Ada v/s GNAT (2013) showing Vast Differences Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:20:28 +0200 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <1441646428.15016.53.camel@obry.net> References: Reply-To: pascal@obry.net NNTP-Posting-Host: m24OXlm8FbKIi/UYdsXELA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27732 Date: 2015-09-07T19:20:28+02:00 List-Id: Le lundi 07 septembre 2015 =C3=A0 04:54 -0700, Lucas Redding a =C3=A9crit : > I forgot to say that platform is Windows 7 (64 bit if that matters) > and the data is in S_RECORD format (With correct ENDIANISM). Probably the issue. You are now targeting a 64bit platform and I bet that since your program is old it was a 32bit Windows at the time. So, it may turn out that this is not a GNAT vs ObjectAda issue at all but a 32bit vs 64bit one. At least check this... --=20 Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B