From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Exclusive file access Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:31:56 +0200 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <1440837116.20971.33.camel@obry.net> References: <75714e3f-c047-413d-9aa5-3ff423167863@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: pascal@obry.net NNTP-Posting-Host: k6pobk03kQbhSeDqzje2KQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27635 Date: 2015-08-29T10:31:56+02:00 List-Id: Le samedi 29 ao=C3=BBt 2015 =C3=A0 09:05 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov a =C3=A9c= rit : > I doubt that. Windows "non-ascii" file names are UTF-16. The only > consistent way to have them would be Wide_Wide_Text_IO with names in > Wide_Wide_String internally recoded to UTF-16. Does GNAT this? I=20 > didn't > look at the implementation, but I bet it does not. Then how would you=20 > do > I/O if the content is not Wide_Wide_String? I bet you meant Wide_ instead of Wide_Wide_ above. Right? --=20 Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B