From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.fcku.it!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is AWS a web server? Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 18:23:39 +0200 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <1438446219.3963.6.camel@obry.net> References: <73c252ea-aba3-497b-b53b-ebf6cfdba723@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: pascal@obry.net NNTP-Posting-Host: iJCCSy4Eqe+st7QFK/iUkA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:194606 Date: 2015-08-01T18:23:39+02:00 List-Id: Le vendredi 31 juillet 2015 =C3=A0 13:49 -0700, Jeffrey R. Carter a =C3=A9c= rit : > I worked on a good-sized, soft-real-time, distributed system that was=20 > accessed > over the internet using AWS. It required a fair amount of JS; the=20 > error rate in > the JS was significantly higher than the Ada. Both AWS and Annex E=20 > imposed > architectural constraints on the system. Today Gnoga would probably=20 > be a better > choice; it would eliminate the JS. Using the Ajax and Web_Block support in AWS you should not have to write JS at all. Maybe for some very specific actions. For example the v2p.fr.eu.org Web site has a single JS routine (3 or 4 lines) if I remember correctly. --=20 Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B