From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.enertel.nl!nntpfeed-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net!feeder.xsnews.nl!feeder.news-service.com!post.news-service.com!news1.surfino.com!not-for-mail Message-Id: <1427674.tkJE89e1rn@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Reply-To: martin@krischik.com Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:21:57 +0100 References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <87is4598pm.fsf@insalien.org> Organization: None User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@surfino.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.169.175.19 (83.169.175.19) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 13:00:08 +0100 X-Trace: f163a422af0c8f60c0ab627918 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8744 comp.lang.c++:44322 comp.realtime:1016 comp.software-eng:4548 Date: 2005-03-06T12:21:57+01:00 List-Id: Peter Koch Larsen wrote: > If you disregard the controversial "export" keyword, most recent compilers > are close to being 100% conforming (but might not be so "out-of-the-box"). This is a good one: All Ada templates are export since 1983 and most C++ compiler still can't do it. Same for the dynamic arrays in C99 which Ada also had since 1983. > Do you also require parenthesis when mixing addition and multiplication? I > do not like that degree of nannying - a matter of taste, surely. No! See http://adaic.org/standards/95lrm/html/RM-4-5.html. Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com