From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8295d69277f1696c X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.195.165 with SMTP id if5mr2665636pbc.1.1337101368346; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Path: pr3ni2125pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lucretia Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: understanding runtime support Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <14241069.50.1337101368021.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbcl10> References: <28695516.0.1336708147839.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcqw9> <28843126.1576.1336884548623.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynff7> <31100317.2013.1336922789420.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynmb39> <7948724.2.1336983886678.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yneo6> <32791890.97.1336995087800.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yneo6> <8547012.586.1337020482714.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlq12> <28034736.36.1337025896359.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynll26> <10099625.0.1337029342748.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yneh4> <47497.3024.1337095350241.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynmk20> <19100327.177.1337097951323.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbtf35> <11591739.3132.1337099384351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynmk20> NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.194.162.188 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337101368 32642 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2012 17:02:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:02:48 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <11591739.3132.1337099384351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynmk20> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.194.162.188; posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-05-15T10:02:48-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:29:44 PM UTC+1, mjs...@scriptoriumdesigns.com wr= ote: > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 9:05:51 AM UTC-7, Lucretia wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 4:22:30 PM UTC+1, mjs...@scriptoriumdesigns.co= m wrote: > >=20 > > > Only a very few dedicated souls will read through existing source to = figure out a way to port that source, but if a cookbook existed, similar to= the doc for an RTOS that tells what each stub subprogram must be coded to = provide, and defines each required data object, I suspect Ada would suddenl= y start appearing on a lot more varied hardware, and start getting noticed = by a lot more people. And that would be a Very Good Thing IMO. > >=20 > > I actually think having this document would be a good idea. I'm willing= to put together the info for bare board that I've worked out into a doc to= include. > >=20 > > Luke. >=20 > You said you're working on an STM32 Discovery board? Which one? I've wo= rked with the STM32VLDiscovery, and the M4 Discovery is intriguing as well. I actually haven't touched it for ages, but the blink app does build and ru= ns on STMF4DISCOVERY board. Luke.