From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:27:13 +0100 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <1420626433.2280.357.camel@obry.net> References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <199c826a-923e-497f-a8e2-9e732c8a5665@googlegroups.com> <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <79f3eff7-2b45-40ae-af94-fa9a17426d82@googlegroups.com> <87tx03rbr2.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1420623515.2280.344.camel@obry.net> <87vbkihp3p.fsf@ixod.org> Reply-To: pascal@obry.net NNTP-Posting-Host: mxtJ5056dp0udyOVtbMH6w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191744 Date: 2015-01-07T11:27:13+01:00 List-Id: Le mercredi 07 janvier 2015 =C3=A0 10:17 +0000, Mark Carroll a =C3=A9crit := =20 > I suppose it depends to what extent AdaCore is a single point of > failure. Does the FSF version get much active development that isn't > hand-me-downs of AdaCore's paid work? I don't mind relying on a free > compiler=20 It's not free it is Open Source. This is for me far better than just free as in freeware for example where from a day to another the product can disappear because the company as decided so. Of course nothing is there forever. But to me an Open Source piece of software has far more chance to live longer. > if there's an associated development community already working > on it directly,=20 I bet that if a strong needs if felt the community will be there to work on this.=20 --=20 Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B