From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e219d94b946dfc26 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Ada.Command_Line and wildcards Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <45dcaed8_6@news.bluewin.ch> <1172132169.423514.271890@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <545bgvF1ttrphU1@mid.individual.net> <1495406.QZvfpqijrQ@linux1.krischik.com> <6dy7mn3hhu.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <1172328891.5496.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1173096982.3712.37.camel@localhost> <8utzwzzv0v.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <1173185771.11841.69.camel@localhost> <11wk29zr0.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <1173305192.29628.82.camel@localhost> <1173447204.5618.131.camel@localhost.localdomain> <8g649apcio.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:59:15 +0100 Message-ID: <141pwb6qwvep7$.19rl1et34x8g6.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Mar 2007 08:58:56 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: f234c8c9.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=c^GElHdn;n=U`5g[@c]@J1ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1Fl8W>\BH3Y2N=gZ0LSBW:1DNcfSJ;bb[5IRnRBaCdihPPg3OPGD9MO]T^L8=7L9 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14461 Date: 2007-03-11T08:58:56+01:00 List-Id: On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:15:06 GMT, Hyman Rosen wrote: > Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> But "interactive command language" is nonsense in these days. There exist >> far better ways of interaction with human beings than command languages. >> They are a legacy of teleprinters. > > Really? Name one. GUI (what about driving cars using an interactive command language? Interaction assumes duplex communication, notion of time and state. People are not so good in simultaneous typing, reading, understanding, predicting.) -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de