From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,278bf0771374076e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed02.chello.at!news.hispeed.ch.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <1408801.XphxQ1p2EE@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: ada is getting spanked :( Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:46:23 +0100 References: <1162052997.664967.135910@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <3321666.DLNnW6yRHq@linux1.krischik.com> <1162097906.483789.59840@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@hispeed.ch Organization: hispeed.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.115.143 (80.218.115.143) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:15:07 +0100 X-Trace: f137b4544711bf57fd62a19433 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7257 Date: 2006-10-29T09:46:23+01:00 List-Id: Isaac Gouy wrote: > > Martin Krischik wrote: >> cl1 wrote: >> >> > I just got wind of this site. It would seem that ada, while not at >> > the very bottom, is one of the slowest languages in this benchmark >> > competition: >> > >> > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org >> >> Looks worse then last time I looked. Seems that some language advocates >> really optimised there implementations. >> >> And there is still one test missing for Ada. >> >> Martin >> -- >> mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net >> Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com > > The positions for the compiled languages shuffled around a bit after we > made an effort to use the same gcc compiler options on all the language > implementations that would take them. I see. perhaps we should have a look at the options used for Ada - there are a few performace options for GNAT only. > And at least on Gentoo, after upgrading to gcc 4.1.1 I'm not that sure > which version of GNAT we should be using? 4.1.* is usually good for Ada - and as we recently found out improves performance as well. Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com