From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.182.76 with SMTP id d12mr3740177itj.11.1518227497904;
        Fri, 09 Feb 2018 17:51:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.32.3 with SMTP id n3mr206313ota.12.1518227497708; Fri,
 09 Feb 2018 17:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!o66no108840ita.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni197itb.0!nntp.google.com!o66no108835ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:51:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e6ab5614-74af-41e1-804c-dec1b84b449c@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.240.214.139;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.214.139
References: <5d9134c9-a7d4-468e-8685-ebbb393eabea@googlegroups.com>
 <p5kk5i$5fj$1@dont-email.me> <p5kl6u$12m5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <p5krq3$103$1@dont-email.me> <wcck1vlex4t.fsf@TheWorld.com>
 <p5l4nl$4hm$1@dont-email.me> <p5l60c$ol$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <e6ab5614-74af-41e1-804c-dec1b84b449c@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <13f51bd1-00ef-4d2a-94b9-2d2560b449f3@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: grassroots thoughts on access types
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 01:51:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1795
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3561877211
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50355
Date: 2018-02-09T17:51:37-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

To Simon Wright:
I think I can see what form will be allowed: dynamic allocaton in used-defi=
ned pools, using allocation mecanisms are proved whose delay is constant or=
 at least predictible... on specific achitectures. That's what it would tak=
e for dynamic allocation to be provable and determinist, I suppose. Is that=
 what you had in mind ?
Sorry if the choice of words wasn't perfect.