From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9413:: with SMTP id
 q19-v6mr3954349ioj.106.1530865484816;
        Fri, 06 Jul 2018 01:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c6ca:: with SMTP id
 w193-v6mr2078225oif.1.1530865484649;
 Fri, 06 Jul 2018 01:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g2-v6no324605itf.0!news-out.google.com!z3-v6ni3484iti.0!nntp.google.com!g2-v6no324602itf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 01:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <phn5e0$l4e$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=136.163.203.6;
 posting-account=g0yTkgoAAADdZGEYyZahxGlO3EkjH0Wv
NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.163.203.6
References: <10ab697c-0f8d-4896-bf4e-44d01f685139@googlegroups.com>
 <phfpel$j05$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <14e32fbe-c090-480b-8f04-d6675834efbd@googlegroups.com>
 <phi77l$iof$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <a1b2fcc4-6a5c-4894-998f-738027d19dd0@googlegroups.com>
 <e1847ed0-54ef-4642-9668-1e94dbcad921@googlegroups.com>
 <phiiso$188l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <a6f1f484-9bdf-4c65-a144-534f95e5735c@googlegroups.com>
 <phn5e0$l4e$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1387a7b5-8ed2-4ab5-a600-9ae124be77b6@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: UDP Send gets NETWORK_IS_UNREACHABLE
From: Petter Fryklund <petter.fryklund@atero.se>
Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 08:24:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53685
Date: 2018-07-06T01:24:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Now I've studied the case a little more and I've found out that in our unit=
 that interfaces with GNAT.Sockets we also uses Get_Host_By_Name. That mayb=
e explains the problem. It's hard to choose interface if both are localhost=
. We will have to solve this differently somewhere in the 5 deep call-chain=
.=20

Thanks for all the help Dmitry.

Regards,
Petter