From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Xref: utzoo comp.object:686 comp.lang.smalltalk:1601 comp.lang.eiffel:553 comp.lang.c++:6045 comp.lang.ada:3134 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!pilchuck!prager From: prager@Data-IO.COM (David Prager) Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Object-Oriented Development Efforts Message-ID: <1364@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM> Date: 8 Jan 90 17:18:15 GMT References: <24386@gryphon.COM> Reply-To: prager@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM (David Prager) Organization: Data I/O Corporation; Redmond, WA List-Id: In article <24386@gryphon.COM> bagpiper@pnet02.gryphon.com (Michael Hunter) writes: >schultz@grebyn.com (Ronald) writes: >> >We use basic OOPs ideas (abstraction, late binding, encapsulation). Up to >this point it has been hard to sell anything to radical to some of the older >engineers. Some of them still think that "data structures" are evil. Oh, no, its older engineers! Pretty soon, we're going to stop using punchcards for our work. We may not program in anything as radical as C++, but we are looking into OOPS; maybe Fortran++. ------------------------------------------------------------------- David Prager (w)206-881-6444 (h)206-485-4397 Data I/O Corp 10525 Willows Rd. NE prager@DATA-IO.COM Redmond, WA. ...uw-beaver!entropy!dataio!prager 98073-9746 or whatever works.