From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!ames!sun-barr!newstop!sun!prosper
From: vladimir@prosper (Vladimir G. Ivanovic)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada tasking
Message-ID: <136227@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 25 May 90 16:23:45 GMT
References: <20075@grebyn.com>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: vladimir@prosper (Vladimir G. Ivanovic)
Organization: sun
In-reply-to: ted@grebyn.com (Ted Holden)
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <20075@grebyn.com>, ted@grebyn (Ted Holden) writes:

>Tasking is naturally an operating system feature;  the idea of tasking
>as a part of a language is one of the dumber ideas since communism.

Here are a few reasons for making tasking a language feature:

(1) The compiler can be used to check the semantics of tasking as well as its
syntax. 

(2) The same model is used by all implementations.

(3) A tasking library is limited to a procedure call interface.  One can't have
the nicely readable syntax of Ada's tasking constructs.

Cheers,

-- Vladimir
--

Vladimir G. Ivanovic			vladimir@sun.com
M/S 12-33				vladimir@prosper.ebb.eng.sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc.			vivanovic@sun.com