From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.149.168 with SMTP id ub8mr44758529obb.8.1438243394776;
        Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.92.247 with SMTP id b110mr651303qge.6.1438243394750;
 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!f3no4794824igg.0!news-out.google.com!4ni82933qgh.1!nntp.google.com!z61no4117512qge.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mpcjpo$93v$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=81.203.145.32;
 posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32
References: <e610ca1e-4df6-4fbb-b3a1-ac35694d9072@googlegroups.com>
 <mp645u$abo$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <2df4698f-4c8e-457c-822d-209cb2f8ab5e@googlegroups.com>
 <mp8r8l$fnn$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <014427b1-ff7a-4a69-82e6-0330af77ed96@googlegroups.com>
 <mpbd8f$re$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <d5a73210-a67f-4d21-8b16-536af10ab157@googlegroups.com>
 <mpborl$6b9$1@dont-email.me>
 <91f88d79-197c-419f-84a8-908e05967a2c@googlegroups.com>
 <d1tst3FoastU1@mid.individual.net> <mpcjpo$93v$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <135c2b00-d13c-4f5d-a586-8aca442d363b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS?
From: EGarrulo <egarrulo@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:03:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27179
Date: 2015-07-30T01:03:14-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 9:31:36 AM UTC+2, bj=F6rn lundin wrote:
> On 2015-07-30 08:01, Niklas Holsti wrote:
> > On 15-07-30 03:10 , EGarrulo wrote:
> >> Who knows?  But since the realm of Ada is limited to embedded
> >> development,
> >=20
> > It isn't.
>=20
> It is certainly not.
> I've spent 18 years writing Ada in WMS/WCS systems -
> Database intense system with 100+ concurrent users
> Nothing embedded at all with them.

That doesn't mean much.  Ada doesn't offer any facility for
automatic resource management, and that makes it unsuitable for
applications that go beyond constrained embedded development.  Who
wants to chase resource leaks in this day and age?  Not to mention
the crippled support for exceptions in Ada.