From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b7d3a51d0d8b6ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x14g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Compiler quality Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:13:46 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <135789fa-1261-4c2f-9fa7-3225d19ecc00@x14g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> References: <20081115101632.5f98c596@cube.tz.axivion.com> <20081122011825.5354d1c1@cube.tz.axivion.com> <9cb27caa-8e9f-4123-ad36-4980c3032722@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <492e7554$0$30237$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <8fbe700c-9b80-46b5-8ebe-8d3ef8fe41ea@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1227863627 29466 127.0.0.1 (28 Nov 2008 09:13:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x14g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.8; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008102920 Firefox/3.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3798 Date: 2008-11-28T01:13:46-08:00 List-Id: On Nov 27, 2:46=A0pm, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > anon schrieb: > > > An example is like using the following statement > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0X :=3D Sin ( A ) + Cos ( W ) ; > > do use need to also create the statement > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0X :=3D Cos ( W ) + Sin ( A ) ; > > Yes, as evidenced byhttp://gcc.gnu.org/PR16095among others. > Schematically, this bug is triggered by "A =3D B" but not by "B =3D A". > And incidentally, it is present in the "bug-free" GNAT 3.15p. To be fair to anon...that's not a SYNTAX bug. His claim was that compilers should be able to be 100% tested for syntax bugs by limiting the input so much that's it becomes practical to do on current machines. Cheers -- Martin