From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cc64201bac042c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Just Passing By Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:13:35 +0200 Organization: AdaCL Message-ID: <1348543.apQ1kNxUMZ@linux1.krischik.com> References: Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1086762193 03 5346 ZG-WGoulS3WSSp6P 040609 06:23:13 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: XLl3BiZXZeRfKs1IMCyZ4I4HcLuDB4dZOntYUGHmD8KIyPeVd3o4Yn User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1269 Date: 2004-06-09T08:13:35+02:00 List-Id: I R T wrote: > "Andrew Carroll" writes: > >>> including a rationale for rewriting BIND. >> Rational? tweakcurrently written in C, need I say more? > > Yes. > > Bind works well. Yes Bind starts quite OK on my computer. But it does not do anything. No matter how many hosts I add to the "database", how much I tweak the configuration, it just won't do anything apart from starting. > Who is likely to use AdaBIND ? I would. > Why waste time and resources if you are just going to reinvent the wheel ? Because Bind is extreamly difficult to configure. With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com