From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8df81176cbd821cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.newsland.it!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <nntp-2005-07@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Range checking not working as expected?
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:17:22 +0000
Message-ID: <1305313.0eqo9PA42Q@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <dcarts$doi$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net jeWiTUSAk4QHJG/7wKMabQpIIv97nkPaL2S+9lALRL2xZD27FH
X-Phone: +41 62 961 13 52
X-Mood: Psychopathic. According to my ex-wife, at least.
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3818
Date: 2005-07-28T15:17:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> Not good - I expected constraint error instead of going round the
> counter.

Try again after compiling with -gnato to actually enable the overflow
checking.


Vinzent.

-- 
worst case: The wrong assumption there actually is one.