From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5a4a1b8fb575be03 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Michael Rice (703) 578-8222" Subject: Re: SW PMs NETWORK PRESENTS TOM GILB INSPECTIONS SEMINAR Date: 1997/01/15 Message-ID: <1300210715011997/A29247/DELTA/11B179D43600*@MHS>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 209979854 sender: Ada programming language priority: normal comments: To: "selgasa (Reply requested)" , content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII sensitivity: Company-Confidential importance: normal mr-received: by mta HERMES; Relayed; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 07:19:14 -0500 autoforwarded: false ua-content-id: 11B179D43600 disclose-recipients: prohibited mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x400-mts-identifier: [;1300210715011997/A29247/DELTA] hop-count: 2 registered-mail-reply-requested-by: riceml@acq.osd.mil Date: 1997-01-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: SPMN: I would agree that hearing from someone of the caliber of Tom Gilb is valuable. However, it would seem even more valuable to hear from those who have applied formal inspections to Navy/DoD programs. Best practices application and experiences shared among the DoD/government community are highly desirable. How about current or high visibility programs such as SSDS, CEC and TBMD, what are their experiences? Is there anyone in the program/project community who have done formal inspections in the past, such as ACDS Block 0 & 1, EMSP, SQQ-89, BSY-2, etc.? What have their experiences rendered? Proof of viability is in the practice. We spend considerable time listening to the Alchemists, what about those responsible for assuring such practices are followed or at least imposed on contractors via contract SOWs.