From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.52.186.103 with SMTP id fj7mr13248354vdc.8.1410735395729; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.41.103 with SMTP id e7mr170407igl.8.1410735395618; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!s7no837368qap.1!news-out.google.com!ef6ni2722igb.0!nntp.google.com!r10no2256816igi.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.6.21.101; posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.21.101 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <12b0f080-6063-4d56-b3f5-c7c9375cac49@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: GNAT stuck, any idea on how to diagnose it? From: Anh Vo Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:56:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:189006 Date: 2014-09-14T15:56:35-07:00 List-Id: On Sunday, September 14, 2014 2:47:47 PM UTC-7, Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > Hello, > > On 2014-09-14, Brad Moore wrote: > > On 2014-09-14 8:49 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:21:18 +0000 (UTC), Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > > Now a secondary question would be, how long is it reasonable to let GNAT > run before assuming it won't terminate ever? It depends on size of the code in question. For normal case if gnat1 occupies close to 99% CPU in 30 seconds or more, that means the compiler runs away. I would submit a bug report. A. Vo