From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.159.104 with SMTP id xb8mr51721728pab.38.1448786722929;
        Sun, 29 Nov 2015 00:45:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.112.135 with SMTP id iq7mr585715obb.10.1448786722888;
 Sun, 29 Nov 2015 00:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!mv3no5287454igc.0!news-out.google.com!f6ni14304igq.0!nntp.google.com!mv3no5287446igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 00:45:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <dgyykfsg080f.qn87qly600iw.dlg@40tude.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=75.161.116.59;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.161.116.59
References: <d6318f11-df2c-49bd-928c-2abb766f9c9a@googlegroups.com>
 <n2tddf$eue$1@dont-email.me> <z1z0lmyfw8oz.11i1vv0zjj8ur$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <lyy4dn3d4r.fsf@pushface.org> <1pl8set3ocirg.1v92rqtxaoq3z$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <69b11711-7f19-4b0f-9a5e-66b873a72cc2@googlegroups.com>
 <176k4qaseow2w.1cckz2yfyq3m2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <0878b65a-dd37-4f30-a49c-2f2e41c06f6a@googlegroups.com>
 <dgyykfsg080f.qn87qly600iw.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <12af12c0-b497-418c-9664-8f91c17df1e3@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT.Serial_Communication and Streams
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 08:45:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28584
Date: 2015-11-29T00:45:22-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 10:43:27 AM UTC-7, Dmitry A. Kazakov wro=
te:
> This immediately follows from being "implementation-defined."
> Implementation-defined =3D [forall] not defined.

Ridiculous.
Just because the standard makes [e.g.] the Address type implementation defi=
ned does not mean that the Address type has no definition, or that absolute=
ly any possible implementation conforms to all requirements. For example th=
e actual range of Standard.Integer is implementation defined, but it cannot=
 be 0..255 because that would not meet the minimum range requirements for S=
tandard.Integer.