From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed02.chello.at!news.hispeed.ch.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-Id: <1278876.2yJb1rELI0@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: AW: How come Ada isn't more popular? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:33:51 +0100 References: User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@hispeed.ch Organization: hispeed.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.75.180.105 (84.75.180.105) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:30:11 +0100 X-Trace: 3b4d845c4c6a3f1ee11cc13699 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8883 Date: 2007-02-03T17:33:51+01:00 List-Id: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG) wrote: > >>> Ada, but they act as if they are ashamed of having anything to >>> do with it. >> I agree the IBM site is not the easiest to navigate. But really it > does >> not seem that hidden. >> www.ibm.com, click products, software by category, Software > Development, >> traditional programming languages & compilers. >> Rational Ada Developer is then on the bottom of the page (In >> alphabetical order) and still above the XC compiler. > > But if you're looking for Ada, you wouldn't expect it under R, would > you? More intersting: Click on "How to Buy"! No price quoted No online order No selling to the general pubic That is my impression. It might have missed something, I might be mistaken but for answering "How come Ada isn't more popular" impression is all that counts. Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com