From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a83584e000bc28fa
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.84.68 with SMTP id w4mr1184354pay.29.1345443159015;
        Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 g9ni110237492pbo.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!74.125.178.16.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada novice <shai.lesh@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada lapack
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <12606f3f-aec1-489c-8325-18e13007b6a6@googlegroups.com>
References: <12f929e9-eea3-4dc9-b10d-71e4f5732e0d@googlegroups.com>
 <615dd222-9c8b-4878-94f7-b1cd4792bd3e@googlegroups.com>
 <36bc4009-6240-4797-991c-b72ec290cedc@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.240.232.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1345189373 10605 127.0.0.1 (17 Aug 2012 07:42:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <36bc4009-6240-4797-991c-b72ec290cedc@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=130.240.232.139;
 posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-08-17T00:42:53-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, August 17, 2012 8:11:33 AM UTC+1, Leo Brewin wrote:
> 
> If you don't see the binaries then that would explain the errors you saw (the output you saw was from a diff command, it wasn't from your binaries).
> 

Here is the output:

I@you ~/work/ada/lapackport/ada_lapack $ ls ex*; ls t*
example01      example01.txt  example02.o    example03.ali  example04.adb
example01.adb  example02      example02.txt  example03.o    example04.ali
example01.ali  example02.adb  example03      example03.txt  example04.o
example01.o    example02.ali  example03.adb  example04      example04.txt
tdgeev      tdgesv      tdgetri      tzgeev      tzgesv      tzgetri
tdgeev.adb  tdgesv.adb  tdgetri.adb  tzgeev.adb  tzgesv.adb  tzgetri.adb
tdgeev.ali  tdgesv.ali  tdgetri.ali  tzgeev.ali  tzgesv.ali  tzgetri.ali
tdgeev.o    tdgesv.o    tdgetri.o    tzgeev.o    tzgesv.o    tzgetri.o
tdgeev.txt  tdgesv.txt  tdgetri.txt  tzgeev.txt  tzgesv.txt  tzgetri.txt
I@you ~/work/ada/lapackport/ada_lapack $

What do you mean by binaries? Are the above files binaries?

Thanks
YC